HEMISPHERIC REPRESENTATION OF THE CENTRAL RETINA OF COMMISSUROTOMIZEDSUBJECTS

Citation
M. Sugishita et al., HEMISPHERIC REPRESENTATION OF THE CENTRAL RETINA OF COMMISSUROTOMIZEDSUBJECTS, Neuropsychologia, 32(4), 1994, pp. 399-415
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Experimental",Neurosciences,Psychology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00283932
Volume
32
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
399 - 415
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-3932(1994)32:4<399:HROTCR>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
It is controversial whether a stimulus projected within 1 to 3 degrees from the boundary between the right and left hemiretina is transmitte d to only one cerebral hemisphere or to both cerebral hemispheres. In order to resolve this issue, letter- and word-stimuli were presented f or 200 msec with a new type of tachistoscope, called the fundus tachis toscope, in and about the central retina, (i.e. fovea, 1.2 degrees in horizontal diameter) of the right eyes of two commissurotomized subjec ts (N.G. and A.A.). During stimulus presentation the subjects were att empting to fixate a fixation target. The fundus tachistoscope combined with image analysis of the fundus enables us to measure the position of the stimulus on the retina, relative to the foveal center, as well as whether or not the eye moved during stimulus presentation. The resu lts indicate that the region of the right (temporal) hemiretina repres ented by both hemispheres in letter processing, if it exists, was esti mated as less than 0.6 degrees from the foveal center. The two subject s frequently (27% in N.G. and 46% in A.A.) fixated the fixation target eccentrically, i.e. with a retinal point other than the foveal center , during fixation, namely stimulus presentation. Their eccentric fixat ions were small with magnitude almost all falling between 1.35 degrees right and 1.25 degrees left of the foveal center. It is therefore rec ommended that letter-stimuli be presented at least 2.0 degrees from th e foveal center in ordinary tachistoscopic studies of cerebral hemisph eric differences. Eye movements, which varied in 0.11 degrees and 1.43 degrees horizontally, occurred in about 8% of all the trials during f ixation. On the average of the two subjects, the eye movements caused or worsened eccentric fixation in only about one third of the trials, and corrected eccentric fixation in about two thirds of the trials.