Effects of various mass media on political learning during the 1992 pr
esidential campaign are examined via analyses of two voter surveys con
ducted in different states. Three indicators of political knowledge ar
e compared: differences on issues between parties (Republican vs. Demo
cratic), differences on issues among candidates (Bush vs. Clinton vs.
Perot), and personal knowledge about the candidates (Bush, Clinton, an
d Perot). Campaign media, including both news coverage and special eve
nts (conventions, debates), added significantly to the prediction of b
oth kinds of knowledge about the candidates, even after controlling fo
r major demographic variables and for habitual uses of news media. Of
the new forms of media campaigning that became prominent in 1992, at l
east the interview/talk show format apparently added to voter learning
about candidates. Television sources of various types tended to contr
ibute more to learning about the candidates, whereas the newspaper was
the medium more associated with knowledge of policy differences betwe
en the two major parties.