EFFECT OF PROPOFOL FOR INDUCTION AND ONDANSETRON WITH OR WITHOUT DEXAMETHASONE FOR THE PREVENTION OF NAUSEA AND VOMITING AFTER MAJOR GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY
R. Mckenzie et al., EFFECT OF PROPOFOL FOR INDUCTION AND ONDANSETRON WITH OR WITHOUT DEXAMETHASONE FOR THE PREVENTION OF NAUSEA AND VOMITING AFTER MAJOR GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, Journal of clinical anesthesia, 9(1), 1997, pp. 15-20
Study Objectives: To test the hypothesis that for major gynecologic su
rgery the combination of propofol for induction, ondansetron, and dexa
methasone would be a more effective antiemetic combination than propof
ol for induction, ondansetron, and saline; and to determine if a propo
fol induction of anesthesia improved our previously reported results w
hen thiamylal was the induction drug. Design: Double-blind, randomized
study. Setting: Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Pati
ents: 80 healthy ASA physical status I, II, and III female inpatients
scheduled for major gynecologic surgery. Interventions: After inductio
n of anesthesia with propofol, Group 1 received intravenous (IV) ondan
setron 4 mg and saline, and Group 2 received IV ondansetron 4 mg follo
wed by IV dexamethasone 20 mg. Measurements and Main Results: For Grou
p 1 and Group 2, respectively, no emesis and no rescue occurred in 15
(37.5%) and 21 (52.5%) patients (p = 0.13); emesis occurred in 7 (17.5
%) Group 1 patients and 5 (12.5%) Group 2 patients, rescue antiemetic
23 (57.5%) Group 1 patients and 19 (47.5%) Group 2 patients. Nausea wa
s reported by 31 (77.5%) Group I patients and 30 (75%) Group 2 patient
s. Conclusions: The hypothesis that the addition of dexamethasone to t
he propofolondansetron combination would significantly reduce postoper
ative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was not confirmed. A propofol inducti
on of anesthesia resulted in a comparable incidence of PONV when compa
red with our previously reported results using thiamylal for induction
of anesthesia for women having major gynecologic operations. (C) 1997
Elsevier Science Inc.