TO PEEP OR NOT TO PEEP

Citation
Km. Bartholomew et al., TO PEEP OR NOT TO PEEP, Archives of Disease in Childhood, 70(3), 1994, pp. 60000209-60000212
Citations number
5
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
ISSN journal
00039888
Volume
70
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
60000209 - 60000212
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9888(1994)70:3<60000209:TPONTP>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
It is well recognised that reducing positive end expiratory pressure ( PEEP) leads to an increase in the tidal volume and minute volume in ve ntilated neonates. The magnitude of this effect is perhaps not commonl y appreciated, however. Effectively, PEEP is four times as potent as p eak inflation pressure (PIP) in bringing about changes in tidal volume . The influence of changes in PEEP and PIP on tidal volume and the rel ative magnitude of each are considered. Twenty one preterm infants wer e studied on 38 separate occasions. All were sedated, paralysed, and v entilated, 19 for hyaline membrane disease. A 1 cm H2O reduction in PE EP was twice as potent as a 2 cm H2O increase in PIP in achieving an i ncrease in tital volume (14 v 7%). Similarly, increasing PEEP by 1 cm H2O was twice as effective as a 2 cm H2O decrease in PIP in reducing t idal volume (13 v 6%). Small (0.5-1 cm H2O) changes in PEEP can often be used to improve ventilation and carbon dioxide elimination. Levels of PEEP of 4-5 cm H2O may, at times, impair gas exchange and contribut e to overdistension.