The Value for Money (VFM) approach to public sector finance, together
with the Citizen's Charter, has placed considerable emphasis on develo
ping performance indicators (PIs) for evaluating local government. Des
pite the publicity given to the approach by some practitioners and con
sultants, the state of the art is primitive and fraught with methodolo
gical problems. The conventional wisdom is to recognize these and argu
e for refinement. However, current PIs are inadequate as the basis for
inter-authority comparison, and should be more appropriately termed '
local government statistics'. The reality is that the methodology of V
FM is less developed than its terminology.