J. Skoularigis et al., NIFEDIPINE VERSUS CAPTOPRIL IN THE MANAGEMENT OF MODERATE HYPERTENSION IN BLACK PATIENTS, American journal of hypertension, 7(5), 1994, pp. 440-447
The efficacy of nifedipine (20 to 40 mg twice daily) and captopril (25
to 50 mg twice daily) was assessed during a 12-week single-blind rand
omized trial in 41 moderately hypertensive black patients (mean 24-h d
iastolic blood pressure [BP] greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg and < 1
15 mm Hg). Nifedipine and captopril were administered as monotherapy i
n increasing dosage while a diuretic was added after 8 weeks in patien
ts who failed to reach the target BP (24-h mean diastolic BP < 90 mm H
g) on monotherapy. After 8 weeks of monotherapy, the mean 24-h ambulat
ory BP was reduced from 156 +/- 12/101 +/- 5 to 128 +/- 11/84 +/- 7 mm
Hg (P < .0001) in the nifedipine group while it remained essentially
unchanged (156 +/- 15/101 +/- 7 to 158 +/- 17/102 +/- 9) in the captop
ril group. Left ventricular (LV) mass under was also reduced significa
ntly (P < .05) in the nifedipine group, while cardiac index and fracti
onal shortening changed marginally. The addition of diuretic in the ca
ptopril group (16/21 patients) resulted in a significant fall in BP to
123 +/- 11/81 +/- 7. Only 2/20 patients in the nifedipine group requi
red the addition of diuretic. The overall incidence of side effects wa
s similar with both treatments but the addition of diuretic in the cap
topril group was followed by adverse changes in serum sodium (P < .01)
, urea (P < .05), and creatinine (P < .01) levels. It is concluded tha
t nifedipine monotherapy offers an effective, safe first-line antihype
rtensive treatment in black patients with moderate hypertension while
captopril alone failed to control the BP. The combination of captopril
and diuretic, although more effective in controlling BP compared with
captopril alone, was associated with significant adverse metabolic ef
fects.