Ba. Lepoire et Jk. Burgoon, 2 CONTRASTING EXPLANATIONS OF INVOLVEMENT VIOLATIONS - EXPECTANCY VIOLATIONS THEORY VERSUS DISCREPANCY AROUSAL THEORY, Human communication research, 20(4), 1994, pp. 560-591
Among the theories that address the impact of variations in immediacy
behaviors during ongoing interactions are expectancy violations (EV) a
nd discrepancy arousal (DA) theories. This study of the effects of vio
lations of expectations on arousal, reciprocity, and compensation in t
he medical practitioner-patient relationship contrasts EV predictions
with DA predictions. EV theory predicts that given a communicator with
high reward valence, high and very high involvement (including touch
and close proximity) should be met with reciprocation (increased invol
vement), and low and very low involvement should be met with compensat
ion (increased involvement). DA theory predicts compensating very high
involvement with decreased involvement, reciprocating high involvemen
t with increased involvement, compensating low involvement with increa
sed involvement, and reciprocating very low involvement, with decrease
d involvement. Results supported neither theory as all involvement cha
nges were met with reciprocity. Additionally, although all violations/
discrepancies were followed by changes in arousal, size of arousal cha
nge was not monotonically related to size of involvement change, as pr
edicted by DA theory. Finally, although positive versus negative emoti
onal experiences were not related to physiological indicators of arous
al change, size of involvement change was directly related to the expe
rience of positive and negative emotions. Thus, it appears that involv
ement change size directly predicts emotional experience and is not me
diated by arousal change.