Current practice recommends metabolic evaluation of patients who have
formed multiple renal stones, but not those with one stone or temporal
ly remote stones. This presumes that recentness and recurrence imply g
reater risk of new future stones. We hypothesize that number of stones
reflects how long patients are permitted to form stones untreated, an
d that forming more stones, itself, raises risk of future stones despi
te treatment. Our report is a retrospective analysis of 371 male patie
nts selected from a comprehensive clinical and laboratory data base co
ntaining 2,527 patients with nephrolithiasis. Before treatment, number
of stone events rises with time of observation, and rate of stone eve
nt occurrence is constant or falls. During treatment, relapse is corre
lated with number of pretreatment stones. Life table analysis showed i
ncreasing relapse for patients grouped into those with one, two, and t
hree or more stones. Even though number of stones seems controlled by
the interval of observation before treatment, more stones predict high
er relapse during treatment. Perhaps by leaving nuclei of crystals as
residues, stones appear to promote new stones, and the practice of wai
ting while patients declare themselves multiple stone formers may not
always be the best.