In this essay the author argues that test security in student testing
is a practice of questionable morality and efficacy, despite the long-
standing use of the practice by test-makers. Arguing that the practice
is an unthinking immoral habit, with its roots in premodern medieval
views of the teacher-student relationship, the author proposes that ne
w policies and practices be formulated to protect the inherently vulne
rable student in the same way that laws now protect adult test-takers
and experimentees. The author argues that secrecy prior to, during, an
d after a test be scrutinized carefully and minimized through the use
of explicit principles-an assessment Bill of Rights-that put the stude
nts' rights on a par with those of the test-maker and that honor the m
odern rights of informed consent and due process.