This paper argues that the question of the relationship between religi
osity and mental health has been miscast because both religiosity and
mental health have been understood in the discipline from a distinctly
modernist perspective. This modernist perspective is characterized by
a metaphysic of substances and by empiricism, and it insists that all
scientifically interesting relationships must be efficient causal rel
ationships among substances. From this perspective the only legitimate
questions revolve around which way the causal arrow points. The paper
argues that this framing of the question and the modernist perspectiv
e which gives rise to it fail as adequate accounts of either phenomeno
n and, thus, of their relation. Further, in some fundamental sense the
perspective fails to take either religiosity or psychopathology serio
usly.