P. Abram et al., PRELIMINARY-RESULTS FROM THE CANCER-RESEARCH CAMPAIGN TRIAL EVALUATING TAMOXIFEN DURATION IN WOMEN AGED 50 YEARS OR OLDER WITH BREAST-CANCER, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 88(24), 1996, pp. 1834-1839
Background: Although trials of postsurgical tamoxifen therapy for pati
ents with breast cancer have convincingly demonstrated reductions in r
elapse rates and improvements in survival, the optimal duration of the
rapy is as yet unclear. Purpose: Our objective is to determine whether
2 or 5 years of tamoxifen therapy (20 mg/day orally) is preferable in
the treatment of patients with early breast cancer. Methods: A random
ized trial that was pragmatic in policy, allowing flexibility in prima
ry treatment (i.e., type of surgery) and adjuvant therapy other than t
amoxifen (i.e., radiotherapy or chemotherapy), was used to encourage m
aximum participation of clinicians and patients. This design allowed c
omparison of the two durations of tamoxifen therapy under conditions i
n which they would subsequently be applied in clinical practice. The p
atients were recruited from the oncology departments of participating
hospitals in the U.K., Belgium, Poland, and Hong Kong. Those women who
had completed an initial 2-year course of tamoxifen therapy after pri
mary surgery and had not experienced a recurrence of breast cancer wer
e asked to consider random assignment either to no further therapy or
to an additional 3 years of tamoxifen. Follow-up reports (every 6 mont
hs for 3 years after random assignment and then annually) were require
d for all surviving study subjects. These reports recorded all breast
cancer-related events (i.e., locoregional relapse and distant metastas
is) or the development of new primary tumors (in the opposite breast o
r at any other site). For patients who died, the date and cause of dea
th were recorded. Event-free survival: overall survival: and time to l
ocoregional relapse, distant metastasis, or the development of new pri
mary cancers were end points for the analysis. Survival comparisons we
re made by use of life tables and the logrank test. Reported P values
are two-sided. Results: By December 31, 1994, 2937 patients had accept
ed random assignment to treatment: 1470 were assigned to stop tamoxife
n therapy after having received it for 2 years and 1467 were assigned
to continue therapy for an additional 3 years (total, 5 years). An ana
lysis was performed when the target for patient accrual had been reach
ed, although the trial remains open. At a median follow-up of 2 years
since the randomization, two treatment groups was detected (relative r
isk = 0.69-1.15), but a statistically significant delay in the time to
relapse for patients receiving the longer treatment was demonstrated
(relative risk = 0.98). Conclusions and Implications: Our results sugg
est that 5 years of tamoxifen therapy, but more evidence regarding the
optimal duration of tamoxifen therapy must be obtained.