K. Osada et al., PREGNANCY INCREASES ET-1-INDUCED CONTRACTION AND CHANGES RECEPTOR SUBTYPES IN UTERINE SMOOTH-MUSCLE IN HUMANS, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 41(2), 1997, pp. 541-548
The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether pregnancy
affects endothelin (ET)-1-induced contraction, the density of ET recep
tors, and the ratio of receptor subtypes (ET(A) and ET(B)) in uterine
smooth muscle in humans. We also investigated which ET receptor subtyp
es mediate ET-l-induced contraction in the human uterus. In uterine me
mbrane preparations, I-125-labeled ET-1 (I-125-ET-1) binding sites (B-
max) in pregnant women did not differ from those in age-matched nonpre
gnant women (596.2 +/- 107.1 vs. 512.1 +/- 167.7 fmol/mg protein). The
dissociation constant (K-d) in pregnant women did not differ from tha
t in nonpregnant women. Competitive displacement experiments with I-12
5-ET-1 binding to the membranes using BQ-123 (ET(A) receptor antagonis
t) showed that the percentage of ET(A) receptors in uterine muscle was
significantly higher in pregnant women than in nonpregnant women (P <
0.01). The calculated ratios of ET(A) to ET(B) receptors in pregnant
and nonpregnant uteri were 92:8 and 68:32, respectively. Combination t
reatment with BQ-788 (ET(B) receptor antagonist) completely inhibited
the BQ-123-resistant component of I-125-ET-1 specific binding. ET-1 ca
used dose-dependent contractions in isolated human uteri from both pre
gnant and nonpregnant women. The maximum response was markedly greater
in pregnant women than in nonpregnant women, whereas pD(2) (-log[EC(5
0)]) values did not differ between pregnant and nonpregnant uteri. In
pregnant human uterus, BQ-123 (10(-6) M) significantly shifted the dos
e-dependent curve of ET-1 response to the right, whereas BQ-3020 (ET(B
) receptor agonist) did not cause contraction. These results suggested
that ET-l-induced contraction of the human uterus is mediated through
only ETA receptors and that ET-l-induced uterine contraction in human
s is markedly increased during pregnancy. In addition, the present stu
dy suggests that, although (125)-ET-1 B-max are not altered during pre
gnancy, the proportion of ET(A) receptors is increased and that of ET(
B) receptors is decreased in the pregnant human uterus.