RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF THE EFFECT OF THE ROYAL-COLLEGE-OF-RADIOLOGISTS GUIDELINES ON GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS REFERRALS FOR RADIOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION
P. Oakeshott et al., RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF THE EFFECT OF THE ROYAL-COLLEGE-OF-RADIOLOGISTS GUIDELINES ON GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS REFERRALS FOR RADIOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION, British journal of general practice, 44(382), 1994, pp. 197-200
Background. The Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines aim to encou
rage more appropriate use of diagnostic radiology and so reduce the us
e of clinically unhelpful x-ray examinations. Aim. The object of this
study was to conduct a randomized controlled trial of the introduction
of the guidelines into general practice. Method. A total of 62 practi
ces (170 general practitioners) referring patients to St George's Hosp
ital, London for diagnostic radiology were randomly allocated into two
groups. Guidelines were sent to the 30 practices in the intervention
group. Radiological referral patterns were compared in both groups bef
ore and after the introduction of guidelines. Results. Practices which
had received guidelines requested significantly fewer examinations of
the spine, and made a significantly higher proportion of requests whi
ch conformed to the guidelines compared with practices which had not r
eceived the guidelines. There were no significant differences in the p
roportion of forms giving physical findings or in the proportion of po
sitive findings at radiology. Conclusion. introduction of guidelines c
an influence general practitioners' radiological referrals in the shor
t term. Wider use of guidelines might help to reduce unnecessary irrad
iation of patients.