MORPHOLOGY OF GALAXIES IN COMPACT-GROUPS

Citation
Cm. Deoliveira et P. Hickson, MORPHOLOGY OF GALAXIES IN COMPACT-GROUPS, The Astrophysical journal, 427(2), 1994, pp. 684-695
Citations number
71
Categorie Soggetti
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Journal title
ISSN journal
0004637X
Volume
427
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Part
1
Pages
684 - 695
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-637X(1994)427:2<684:MOGIC>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
We present the results of an isophotal analysis of 140 early-type gala xies and a visual inspection of images of an additional 202 galaxies i n compact groups. This is essentially the entire sample of galaxies in the subset of 92 Hickson compact groups which have at least three acc ordant members. About 12% of the elliptical galaxies have larger chara cteristic radii and shallower surface brightness profiles than galaxie s of the same luminosity in less dense environments. The average ellip ticity of elliptical galaxies in compact groups is a slowly increasing function of the metric radius, as it is for field and loose-group gal axies. No alignment is found among the major axes of the galaxies and the major axis of the group. When combined with previously published m orphological, kinematic, radio, infrared, and color information on the same galaxies, our data show that 43% of the galaxies in the compact group sample show morphological and/or kinematical distortions indicat ive of interactions and/or mergers. About 32% of the groups have three or more galaxies which show some sign of interaction. This is a lower limit, since for the great majority of the galaxies in the groups, on ly imaging and low-resolution spectra are available. For the subsample of 16 groups for which published detailed kinematical data are also a vailable, the fraction of groups with three or more galaxies in intera ction is 75%. No correlation is found between the number of interactin g galaxies in a group and the group velocity dispersion or crossing ti me. These observations strongly support the view that compact groups a re systems of physically associated galaxies and not chance alignments of field, loose-group, or cluster galaxies. They also confirm the imp ortance of compact groups for studies of interactions and galaxy evolu tion. While the lack of a good control sample makes it difficult to ma ke quantitative comparisons for some aspects of this study, it is clea r that the fraction of galaxies showing evidence of interactions is mu ch higher in compact groups than in other environments.