Am. Salzberg et al., ANALYZING THE IMPACT OF AZT ON THE PROGRESSION OF HIV-INFECTION - PROPORTIONAL OR CONSTANT DELAY OVER 3 YEARS OF TREATMENT, Socio-economic planning sciences, 31(1), 1997, pp. 1-9
The optimum time to begin antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV infected
individuals is controversial. Using a Markov chain approach, the auth
ors have re-analyzed several apparently inconsistent studies designed
to measure the effect of early AZT on the progression of HIV disease.
We find that, for at least up to three years, early AZT therapy is con
sistent with increasing the time to AIDS by a multiplicative factor (r
ate change) rather than a fixed delay. The negative judgments of early
AZT, based on results reported by Hamilton et al. for survival and th
e Concorde study group in regard to both AIDS and death, may be owing
to comparison with the null hypothesis that treatment has no effect ra
ther than with the rate-change hypothesis. These results can lead to i
mportant policy decisions as early treatment might enhance treatment e
fficacy by decreasing the progression hazard by a factor of up to 1.7,
especially if multi-drug ART is used. Multi-drug ART is needed for lo
ng-term therapy (greater than three years) because of the development
of resistant viruses.