Jt. Manning et At. Chamberlain, SIB COMPETITION AND SPERM COMPETITIVENESS - AN ANSWER TO WHY SO MANY SPERMS AND THE RECOMBINATION SPERM NUMBER CORRELATION/, Proceedings - Royal Society. Biological Sciences, 256(1346), 1994, pp. 177-182
Sperm, or inter-ejaculate, competition leads to the evolution of many
sperm per ejaculate. However, sperm competition theory does not predic
t the correlation between sperm number and chiasma, or that between sp
erm number and haploid chromosome number. Firstly, we show that phylog
enetic inertia cannot account for at least the latter relation, and se
condly, a model is presented which incorporates sib competition (intra
-ejaculate competition) and sperm competitiveness to explain the relat
ion between sperm numbers and recombination and the question 'Why so m
any sperms?'. It is argued that if there are deleterious mutations whi
ch affect sperm competitiveness this will lead to sib or intra-ejacula
te competition. If inter-ejaculate competition also exists, then there
will be selection for increased recombination. A chiasmate male heter
ozygous for n mutations which reduce sperm competitiveness can produce
gametes with 0...n mutations. The proportion of gametes with 0 mutati
ons per ejaculate is s = 0.5(n), which is a small fraction. This means
that to ensure on average one sperm with 0 mutations per ejaculate, a
chiasmate male must produce 1/s sperm. We may therefore expect that 1
/s will be positively correlated with sperm numbers. If inter-ejaculat
e competition leads to an optimum sperm number of x, then the optimum
number of sperm per ejaculate is x/s. Sperm numbers will be increased
by: (i) the number of loci which affect sperm competitiveness in the h
aploid state; (ii) the mutation rate; and (iii) the recombination rate
. A correlation between recombination rates and sperm numbers is there
fore to be expected.