Pm. Rodgers et al., DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED IR IMAGING OF THE PORTAL VENOUS SYSTEM - COMPARISON WITH X-RAY ANGIOGRAPHY, Radiology, 191(3), 1994, pp. 741-745
PURPOSE: To compare dynamic contrast material-enhanced multisection ma
gnetic resonance (MR) imaging with x-ray angiography in the evaluation
of the portal venous system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients
underwent preoperative x-ray angiography and dynamic contrast-enhance
d MR imaging. MR imaging was performed at 1.0 T with a multisection br
eath-hold fast low-angle shot (FLASH) technique in the coronal-oblique
plane, before and after injection of a bolus of gadopentetate dimeglu
mine. The portal vein, its right and left intrahepatic branches, the s
plenic veins, and the superior mesenteric veins were examined. The pre
sence of varices was also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 84 vessels evaluat
ed with both techniques, appearances were similar in 76 (90%). Both ex
aminations showed the main portal vein to be patent in nine patients,
occluded in five, and patent but abnormal in two. Findings in the main
portal vein were discordant in two patients. In one patient, surgical
follow-up helped confirm the findings at MR imaging. CONCLUSION: MR i
maging can replace x-ray angiography in the preoperative evaluation of
portal vein patency in most patients.