The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) has instituted a new analysis
methodology for estimating the expected annual damage (EAD) and resul
ting economic benefits accruing to proposed flood damage-reduction pro
jects Although the methodology is new, it still, in effect, uses expec
ted probability to estimate the frequency of flooding and EAD. The Nat
ional Research Council (NRC) in a review of USACE's study of the Ameri
can River levees stated that the use of expected probability results i
n significantly biased estimates of EAD. An alternative damage model t
o that proposed by NRC is used to show that expected probability leads
to an unbiased estimate of EAD. The damage model proposed requires th
at an unbiased estimate of damage results when applied to many project
s. A simulation study demonstrates that EAD estimated with expected pr
obability is unbiased, whereas the NRC's recommended estimator is bias
ed.