Examination of the correlations among Measures of performance on Stern
berg's item-recognition task by 136 students showed a low correlation
of .38 between the slopes of the functions relating response latency t
o set size for positive and negative responses. The correlation betwee
n the mean latency of positive and negative responses was substantiall
y higher (r = .91) than that of the slopes. The low correlation betwee
n the slopes suggests a mechanism such as an adjustable response crite
rion that results in a tradeoff between response latency on positive a
nd negative trials.