Mjg. Farthing et al., PHARMACOKINETICS OF NAFTOPIDIL, A NOVEL ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUG, IN PATIENTS WITH HEPATIC-DYSFUNCTION, Postgraduate medical journal, 70(823), 1994, pp. 363-366
The pharmacokinetics of naftopidil, a novel alpha-1 adrenoceptor-block
ing antihypertensive, were investigated in ten patients (9M/1F) with h
epatic dysfunction after oral administration (50 mg, tablet) and after
an intravenous infusion of 5.0 mg over 2 minutes. Results were compar
ed to a control group of 12 healthy subjects (6M/6F) of a previous inv
estigation, which was carried out according to the identical study pro
tocol. The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained for the i.v. administra
tion were comparable in both groups (half Life 3.6 +/- 3.4 hours in li
ver-impaired subjects versus 3.3 +/- 2.1 hours in controls; clearance
11.9 +/- 4.7 ml/minute/kg versus 11.0 +/- 1.6 ml/minute/kg). Following
oral administration the plasma levels and half-life times of naftopid
il were significantly increased in Liver impairment (t(1/2) 16.6 +/- 1
9.3 hours versus 5.4 +/- 3.2 hours in controls; P = 0.012). Mean value
s for the absolute bioavailability in patients with hepatic dysfunctio
n were significantly higher (mean 75%, median 53%, range 13.4-211.0%)
compared to healthy subjects (mean 17%, median 16%, range 6.7-29.6%, P
= 0.001). Reduction of functional hepatic blood flow in chronic liver
disease or, as evidenced in one case as a consequence of shunt surger
y, is the probable cause of the observed alteration in naftopidil kine
tics. This phenomenon occurred only following the oral 50 mg dose wher
eas the intravenous 5 mg dose obviously still could be normally handle
d. Naftopidil demethylation and hydroxylation were both less and non-u
niformly affected. The pharmacokinetic findings suggest that in patien
ts with severe hepatic impairment or evidence for marked changes in he
patic blood how the dose of naftopidil may require adjustment to the l
ower end of the therapeutic range and/or may be limited to once daily.
However, before definite conclusions can be drawn, further steady-sta
te studies are required. Despite the pharmacokinetic discrepancies no
difference in drug tolerability was seen between patients and healthy
subjects.