Fm. Newmann et al., ACCOUNTABILITY AND SCHOOL PERFORMANCE - IMPLICATIONS FROM RESTRUCTURING SCHOOLS, Harvard educational review, 67(1), 1997, pp. 41-74
Many politicians and policymakers today link school accountability and
school performance. Drawing on evidence from the corporate world, the
y assume that strong external accountability will impel schools to imp
rove student achievement. In this article, however, Fred Neumann, M. B
ruce King; and Ma;rk Rigdon argue that three issues Keep this popular
theory from working in practice. 1) implementation controversies aroun
d standards, incentives,and constituencies; b) insufficient efforts to
organize the human, technical, and social resources of a school into
an effective collective enterprise - what the authors term ''organizat
ional capacity'' - and c) failure to recognize the importance of inter
nal school accountability. In a study of twenty-four restructuring sch
ools, the authors found that strong accountability was rare; that orga
nizational capacity was not related to accountability; that schools wi
th strong external accountability tended to have low organizational ca
pacity; and that strong internal accountability tended to reinforce a
school's organizational capacity. Although the implications' of this s
tudy for both accountability policy and, more broadly, school restruct
uring efforts may appear disconcerting, the authors conclude with seve
ral practical guidelines to stimulate the Kind of internal accountabil
ity that they found to be related to enhanced school performance.