U. Ekblad et al., COMPARISON OF INTRAVAGINAL AN 2 INTRACERVICAL PROSTAGLANDIN-E2 GELS IN PREINDUCTION OF LABOR, Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae, 83, 1994, pp. 64-67
A randomized study was undertaken to compare the effect of vaginal (1
mg of dinoprostone/2.5 ml gel) and intracervical (0.5 mg of dinoprosto
ne in 2.5 ml of two different vehicles) on induction of labor and peri
natal outcome. Sixty women (n = 20/20/20) who presented with an unfavo
rable cervix and a specific indication for the induction of labor part
icipated in the study. There were no significant differences between t
he groups with respect to maternal age, weight, parity, gestational le
ngth or Bishop scores before prostaglandin E2 preinduction. Labour was
induced with prostaglandin gel alone in twenty-two patients and with
oxytocin infusion on the following morning after gel application in se
ven patients; altogether the rate of succesful induction was 48.3 %. T
he rate of uterine hyperstimulation was 16.7 % with most cases in the
groups receiving intracervical prostaglandin E2. Neonatal asphyxia dia
gnosed with umbilical vein and artery blood gas analysis was seen in e
leven neonates who were delivered by labor induced with prostaglandin
gel alone (50 %). Prostaglandin pre-induction decreases the need for C
esarean sections in complicated pregnancies, but because of the risk o
f uterine hyperstimulation and neonatal asphyxia prostaglandins should
be used only with specific indications.