Jk. Blackshaw et al., COMPARISON OF BEHAVIOR PATTERNS OF SOWS AND LITTERS IN A FARROWING CRATE AND A FARROWING PEN, Applied animal behaviour science, 39(3-4), 1994, pp. 281-295
The behaviours of eight sows (Large White X Landrace) and litters hous
ed in a farrowing crate (600-800 mm width adjustable crates in a 2130
mm X 1850 mm pen) were compared with the behaviours of eight sows and
litters in a farrowing pen (2130 mm X 1850 mm) using data from real-ti
me videotapes. Each sow and litter was videotaped on day 1 or 2 after
parturition and on six other occasions between days 6 and 30. Piglet a
ctivity was similar in the farrowing crate and the farrowing pen syste
ms both in the pen area and at the udder. The farrowing pen piglets re
sted in the pen area nearly three times as long as the farrowing crate
animals (1003 +/- 75 vs 315 +/- 40; P<0.01; all frequencies per 3 h t
ape). Piglets in both systems spent a similar amount of time resting a
t the udder; however, those in the farrowing crate, spent twice as lon
g under the heat lamp (1350 +/- 68 vs 671 +/- 58; P<0.01). Sows in the
farrowing crate were less than half as active as sows in the farrowin
g pen system when lying down (stretching, kicking, shaking or rolling)
(frequencies per 3 h tape, 10.2 +/- 1.2 vs 23.9 +/- 1.5; P<0.05). Sow
s in both systems sat, stood up and ate the same amount of time. The s
ucking activity duration (slow sucking and rapid sucking) of the pigle
ts was significantly longer in the farrowing crate (3.1 +/- 0.1 min vs
2.3 +/- 0.1 min; P<0.01; duration per 3 h tape). Mortality rates of p
iglets in the farrowing pen system was 32% vs 14% in the farrowing cra
te (t(14)=2.116; P=0.053) which suggested that the farrowing pen syste
m was more hazardous for piglet welfare than the farrowing crate for t
he breed of pig used in this study.