B. Szalontai et al., STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PHYCOCYANIN AND ALLOPHYCOCYANIN FROM THEIR RESONANCE RAMAN-SPECTRA, Photochemistry and photobiology, 59(5), 1994, pp. 574-578
Resonance Raman spectra of the chromophores of the cyanobacterial ligh
t-harvesting proteins phycocyanin (CPC) and allophycocyanin (APC) were
recorded using 364 nm excitation. The 1500-1700 cm(-1) regions of the
se spectra were analyzed for the pH-induced structural changes accompa
nying the disruption of the native trimers into monomers as well as th
e progressive denaturation of these monomers. Computer-assisted decomp
osition of the 1642 cm(-1) marker bands of these spectra yielded up to
four components (named I-IV), the frequencies of which were constant
within 5 cm(-1) (CPC) and 10 cm(-1) (APC). The relative intensities of
two of these components, namely I and III, were sensitive to chromoph
ore conformations. The previously reported downshift of the 1642 cm(-1
) band upon folding of the chromophores was shown to result from a wea
kening of component I and a concomitant enhancement of component III.
Components I-IV had different relative intensity patterns in CPC and A
PC spectra. In particular, the higher relative intensity of component
I at 1646 cm(-1) indicated more extended average conformations of the
chromophores in trimeric APC than in trimeric CPC. This difference lik
ely resulted from the extra beta-155 chromophore present in CPC. Compo
nent III was sizably active in RR spectra of monomeric APC but was not
observed either in those of monomeric CPC or in those of trimeric APC
and CPC. This indicated that, in APC monomers, chromophore(s) did not
assume the native conformations found in the trimer, while monomer fo
rmation did not sizably alter the structures of the CPC chromophores.