Pa. Schulze et al., A LABORATORY AND FIELD-EVALUATION OF A PORTABLE IMMUNOASSAY TEST FOR TRIAZINE HERBICIDES IN ENVIRONMENTAL WATER SAMPLES, International journal of environmental analytical chemistry, 53(4), 1993, pp. 307-319
The usefulness and sensitivity, of a portable immunoassay test for the
semiquantitative field screening of water samples was evaluated by me
ans of laboratory and field studies, Laboratory results indicated that
the tests were useful for the determination of atrazine concentration
s of 0.1 to 1.5 mug/L. At a concentration of 1 mug/L, the relative sta
ndard deviation in the difference between the regression line and the
actual result was about 40 percent. The immunoassay was less sensitive
and produced similar errors for other triazine herbicides. After stan
dardization, the test results were relatively insensitive to ionic con
tent and variations in pH (range, 4 to 10), mildly sensitive to temper
ature changes, and quite sensitive to the timing of the final incubati
on step, variances in timing can be a significant source of error. Alm
ost all of the immunoassays predicted a higher atrazine concentration
in water samples when compared to results of gas chromatography. If th
ese tests are used as a semiquantitative screening tool, this tendency
for overprediction does not diminish the tests' usefulness. Generally
, the tests seem to be a valuable method for screening water samples f
or triazine herbicides.