Objective: To evaluate the use of the 25 mm Biofragmentable Anastomoti
c Ring (BAR) in traumatic small bowel injury. Methods: In a one year p
rospective, non-randomized study, 18 patients (x age = 25 yrs) with pe
netrating small bowel injury had 25 BAR devices placed to restore inte
stinal continuity. Using one-way analysis of variance, this group was
compared to 63 historical controls (x age = 27 yrs) with small bowel t
rauma who had either sutured or stapled anastomoses (SSA), with regard
to Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI) score, time until return
of bowel function, and postoperative morbidity. Results: PATI scores
for the two groups were not significantly different (P = 0.099). No de
aths in the SSA group (n = 8) or in the BAR group (n = 1) were related
to the anastomotic technique. There was no significant difference (P
= 0.991) in the rate of post-operative intestinal obstruction between
BAR (n = 3) and SSA (n = 8) groups; none of the BAR patients required
re-operation. The average length of time for return of bowel function
was not significantly different (P = 0.197) between BAR (4.3 days) and
SSA (5.8 days) groups. Conclusions: The 25 mm BAR may be used in the
repair of traumatic small bowel injury, based upon comparable outcomes
when compared with sutured and stapled anastomoses.