Based on experience with over 2,000 patients, the treatment of ureteri
c stones today relies on extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)
in situ and ureteroscopy with semirigid, ultrathin ureteroscopes combi
ned with pneumatic or laser lithotripsy. All stones in the upper and l
arger stones in the distal third of the ureter are preferably treated
by ESWL in situ, whereas smaller stones in the distal ureter are bette
r treated by endoscopy. Midureteric stones continue to be the domain o
f primary ureteroscopy; in cases of moderate obstruction in asymptomat
ic patients, it may also be acceptable to wait for the stone to pass i
nto the distal ureter spontaneously to be treated by ESWL in situ ther
e. Manipulation of the stone back into the kidney and treating it by E
SWL there (push back/ESWL) offers no advantage over ESWL in situ, as r
esults are not better yet morbidity is higher. 'Blind' instrumentation
has lost all justification, and incisional ureteric lithotomy is no l
onger indicated but in exceptional cases.