E. Stahle et al., LONG-TERM RELATIVE SURVIVAL AFTER PRIMARY HEART-VALVE REPLACEMENT, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 11(1), 1997, pp. 81-90
Objective: Determination of the optimal timing of primary heart valve
replacement is an important issue. The present paper provides a synops
is over early and late survival after primary heart valve replacement,
including an evaluation of the excess mortality among heart valve rep
lacement patients compared with the general population. Methods: Survi
val was analyzed in 2365 patients (1568 without and 797 with concomita
nt coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)) who underwent their first h
eart valve replacement. Observed survival was related to that expected
among persons from the general Swedish population stratified by age,
sex, and 5-year calendar period, to calculate the relative survival an
d estimate the disease-specific survival. Results: Early mortality (de
ath within 30 days after surgery) was 5.9% after aortic valve replacem
ent, 10.4% after mitral valve replacement and 10.6% after combined aor
tic and mitral valve replacement. Relative survival rates (excluding e
arly deaths) were 84% 10 years after aortic, 68.5% after mitral and 80
.9% after both aortic and mitral valve replacement. A multivariate mod
el based on observed survival rates was produced for each group, using
the Cox proportional hazards model. Concomitant CABG, advanced New Yo
rk Heart Association (NYHA) class, preoperative atrial fibrillation, p
ure aortic regurgitation and higher age increased the late observed su
rvival after aortic valve replacement. NYHA class was the only factor
independently related to observed late deaths after mitral valve repla
cement, and mitral insufficiency the only corresponding factor after b
oth aortic and mitral valve surgery. Conclusion: The use of relative s
urvival rates tended to modify the difference between subgroups compar
ed with observed survival rates. Relative survival rates reduced the e
ffect of concomitant CABG on survival, but enhanced for example the ef
fect of aortic regurgitation. In patients greater than or equal to 70
years of age and patients submitted to aortic or mitral valve replacem
ent with mild or no symptoms, the survival rate was similar for many y
ears to that in the Swedish population at large. Copyright (C) 1997 El
sevier Science B.V.