The experiments presented here examined how varied representations of
relational structure affect analog retrieval. Subjects were asked to i
dentify analogies between disparate base and target passages. The expr
ession of relations within analogs was varied to make the analogical s
imilarity more or less manifest. Analog retrieval was better when pass
ages (a) gave less instantiating detail and expressed analogous relati
ons with relatively domain-general terms, i.e., terms that could fit b
oth domains, as opposed to domain-specific terms whose components cann
ot apply literally to both domains, or (b) expressed local analogous r
elations by domain-general rather than domain-specific verbs, or (c) u
sed a domain-general term to lexicalize a higher-order relation implic
it in domain-specific detail. These results suggest that even when ana
logous relations are embedded in dissimilar contexts, the way relation
s are represented within those contexts can affect analogical access.
Access is easier with manifest representations that require little re-
representation to reveal a match across domains. (C) 1994 Academic Pre
ss, Inc.