Whilst sociology has taken a consistent interest in psychiatry, theore
tical and methodological approaches have varied. This paper summarises
three versions of the sociology of psychiatry (social causationism, i
nterpretive micro-sociology and structuralism). These are then contras
ted with the more recent post-structuralist emphasis on deconstruction
. The latter has emphasised a discursive shift in psychiatry since Vic
torian times, from brain to mind, from coercion to voluntarism, and fr
om hospital to community. The advantages and disadvantages of such an
analysis are examined. It is concluded that this analysis has been ill
uminating but that the older approaches it challenges still have merit
s. The implications of attempting to reconcile these approaches to the
analysis of contemporary psychiatry are discussed.