Rm. Campbell et al., ENHANCED STABILITY AND POTENCY OF NOVEL GROWTH HORMONE-RELEASING FACTOR (GRF) ANALOGS DERIVED FROM RODENT AND HUMAN CRF SEQUENCES, Peptides, 15(3), 1994, pp. 489-495
Native human GRF(1-44)-NH2 (hGRF44) is subject to biological inactivat
ion by both enzymatic and chemical routes. In plasma, hGRF44 is rapidl
y degraded via dipeptidylpeptidase IV (DPP-IV) cleavage between residu
es Ala(2) and Asp(3). The hGRF44 is also subject to chemical rearrange
ment (Asn(8) --> Asp(8), beta-Asp(8) via aminosuccinimide formation) a
nd oxidation [Met(27) --> Met(O)(27)] in aqueous environments, greatly
reducing its bioactivity. It is therefore advantageous to develop lon
g-acting GRF analogues using specific amino acid replacements at the a
mino-terminus (to prevent enzymatic degradation): residue 8 (to reduce
isomerization) and residue 27 (to prevent oxidation). Inclusion of Al
a(15) substitution (for Gly(15)), previously demonstrated to enhance r
eceptor binding affinity, would be predicted to improve GRF analogue p
otency. Substitution of [His(1),Val(2)]-(from the mouse GRF sequence)
for [Tyr(1),Ala(2)]-(human sequence) in [Ala(15),Leu(27)]hGRF(1-32)-OH
analogues completely inhibited (24-h incubation) DPP-IV cleavage and
greatly increased plasma stability in vitro. Additional substitution o
f Thr(8) (mouse GRF sequence), Ser(8) (rat GRF sequence), or Gln(8) (n
ot naturally occurring) for Asn(8) (human GRF sequence) resulted in an
alogues with enhanced aqueous stability in vitro (i.e., decreased rate
of isomerization). These three highly stable and enzymatically resist
ant hGRF(1-32)-OH analogues, containing His(1), Val(2), Thr/Ser/Gln(8)
, Ala(15), and Leu(27) replacements, were then bioassayed for growth h
ormone (GH)-releasing activity in vitro (rat pituitary cell culture) a
nd in vivo (SC injection into pigs). Enhanced bioactivity was observed
with all three hGRF(1-32)-OH analogues. In vitro, these analogues wer
e approximately threefold more potent than hGRF44, whereas in vivo the
y were eleven- to thirteenfold more potent. As the in vitro results re
flect only receptor affinity and signal transduction, the increment in
potency observed in vivo is likely due to the increased biological ha
lf-life of these analogues (i.e., the result of decreased enzymatic an
d chemical decomposition such that more bioactive peptide is available
per unit time).