The relationship between conduit (vessel and tracheid) diameter and wa
ter-stress-induced air embolism was examined using a double staining t
echnique. Comparisons were made between irrigated control plants at wa
ter potentials of -1.3 MPa and water stressed plants at about -8 MPa.
Water stress was induced either by natural drought conditions or by la
boratory drying of shoots from previously irrigated shrubs. Stem segme
nts were perfused with 0.1% basic fuchsin to mark the initially conduc
tive conduits, and, following high pressure perfusion of 10 mM citric
acid to remove embolisms, with 0.1% alcian blue to mark the initially
embolized conduits. Hydraulic conductance per pressure gradient (k(h))
was measured before and after embolisms were removed. Diameters of no
n-embolized and embolized conduits were then measured microscopically
in transverse stem sections. In irrigated controls there was little em
bolism and mean diameters were not significantly different for emboliz
ed vs. non-embolized conduits. For both artificially dehydrated and na
turally droughted plants there was a 91% drop in k(h) due to embolism,
and the mean diameter of embolized conduits was about 30 mu m vs. 21
mu m for non-embolized conduits. With increasing conduit diameter ther
e was an increased probability of embolism. Wider conduits may have la
rger pores in their pit membranes, thus increasing their vulnerability
to water-stress-induced embolism. Alternatively, wider conduits may m
erely have more pits, thus increasing their statistical chances of hav
ing a particularly large pore in an air-exposed pit membrane. Narrow v
essels and tracheids provide an interwoven auxiliary transport system
that appears to be of importance to transport when many of the wider,
more efficient conduits become embolized.