EFFECTS OF ANTI-CD44 MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY ON ADHESION OF ERYTHROID LEUKEMIC-CELLS (ELM-I-1) TO HEMATOPOIETIC SUPPORTIVE CELLS (MS-5) - CD44,BUT NOT HYALURONATE-MEDIATED, CELL-CELL ADHESION
K. Sugimoto et al., EFFECTS OF ANTI-CD44 MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY ON ADHESION OF ERYTHROID LEUKEMIC-CELLS (ELM-I-1) TO HEMATOPOIETIC SUPPORTIVE CELLS (MS-5) - CD44,BUT NOT HYALURONATE-MEDIATED, CELL-CELL ADHESION, Experimental hematology, 22(6), 1994, pp. 488-494
Cocultivation of erythroid leukemic cells (ELM-I-1) with hemopoietic s
upportive cells (MS-5) resulted in a specific adhesion of ELM-I-1 cell
s to MS-5 cells. This phenomenon was designated as rosette formation.
After induction of differentiation of ELM-I-1 cells, rosette formation
was reduced, and no rosette formation was observed between erythrocyt
es and MS-5 cells. Studies on anti-adhesion molecule antibody treatmen
t have revealed that CD44 plays a key role in rosette formation. Expre
ssion of CD44 on (the membrane of) ELM-I-1 cells was reduced after dif
ferentiation, and no CD44 expression was detected on erythrocytes. CD4
4 was also expressed on MS-5. Hyaluronate is known as the ligand of CD
44, but neither hyaluronidase treatment nor addition of excess hyaluro
nate to the assay system affected rosette formation. These data indica
te that hyaluronate is not responsible for rosette formation. Anti-CD4
4 antibody (KM81), which recognized the hyaluronate binding site of CD
44, inhibited rosette formation. But other monoclonal antibodies again
st different epitopes except for the hyaluronate binding site, even th
ose against CD44's hyaluronate binding site, did not inhibit rosette f
ormation. Thus, rosette formation between MS-5 cells and ELM-I-1 cells
is mediated by CD44 but not by the hyaluronate binding site of CD44.