BUD DEMOGRAPHY OF THE MOUNTAIN BIRCH BETULA-PUBESCENS SSP TORTUOSA NEAR TREE LINE

Citation
K. Lehtila et al., BUD DEMOGRAPHY OF THE MOUNTAIN BIRCH BETULA-PUBESCENS SSP TORTUOSA NEAR TREE LINE, Ecology, 75(4), 1994, pp. 945-955
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Ecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00129658
Volume
75
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
945 - 955
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-9658(1994)75:4<945:BDOTMB>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The aim of this study was (1) to evaluate the importance of dormant bu ds for the bud demography of the mountain birch Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa near the tree line and (2) to study whether sexual reproducti on leads to costs for bud production rates. A bud population census wa s taken in two consecutive years for six branches of each of 90 mounta in birch trees. The trees were growing in a common garden and belonged to 10 different progenies originating from different parts of Finnish Lapland. The data were analyzed with matrix population models. The mo st important transformations of the bud populations were between veget ative short and long shoots. However, if most apparently dead buds are actually latent dormants, they make an even more important contributi on to the bud population growth rate than vegetative long and short sh oots. Dormant buds may have considerable importance especially after e vents such as herbivore outbreaks, in which short and long shoots are damaged. Generative long shoots (with male catkins) and short shoots ( with female catkins) had approximately the same bud production rate as the corresponding vegetative shoots, i.e., bud populations did not sh ow any major costs due to sexual reproduction. Meristem costs, i.e., a decrease in the number of buds due to sexual reproduction, may be rel atively low in mountain birch, because new axillary buds develop and c ompensate for lost shoot apices. This compensation capacity may be esp ecially well developed under suboptimal conditions, where canopy expan sion is limited by the harsh environment rather than by the availabili ty of meristems. The resource cost of reproduction (e.g., in terms of carbon or mineral nutrients) may also be partly compensated especially when flowering intensity is sufficiently low.