FORAGE YIELD AND COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS OF LEUCAENA SPECIES AND HYBRIDS ADAPTED TO COOL SITES

Citation
Ra. Wheeler et al., FORAGE YIELD AND COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS OF LEUCAENA SPECIES AND HYBRIDS ADAPTED TO COOL SITES, Agroforestry systems, 25(3), 1994, pp. 263-274
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Forestry,Agriculture
Journal title
ISSN journal
01674366
Volume
25
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
263 - 274
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-4366(1994)25:3<263:FYACAO>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Four species of Leucaena (L. leucocephala, L. diversifolia 2n and 4n, and L. pallida) and three interspecific hybrids KX1 (L. diversifolia x L. pallida), KX2 (L. leucocephala x L. pallida), and KX3 (L. leucocep hala x L. pallida) were evaluated for forage yield on a cool upland si te at the Mealani Research Station on the island of Hawaii (900 m elev ation). Two-month-old seedlings were planted at a density equivalent t o 40,000 trees/ha and coppiced (harvested) every six months for a two- year period. Leaf material collected from the plots was oven-dried, fi nely ground, and evaluated for forage components and digestibility. Tw o Holstein steers fitted with cannulae in the rumen and proximal duode num were used to conduct a replicated trial to examine rumen and post- rumen dry matter and crude protein digestibility of leaf material. Nyl on bags containing leaf material from K636 (L. leucocephala), KX2 (L. leucocephala x L. pallida), or K376 (L. pallida) were suspended in the rumen for periods of 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours. Weight loss w as measured and nitrogen content of each sample was determined using a macro-Kjeldahl procedure. Subsequently, rumen-incubated material was placed in nylon bags, inserted into the duodenal cannulae of the two s teers and collected in the feces for periods of 24 h after insertion. Results indicate that varieties and hybrids of Leucaena are adapted to cool sites and produce good yields of high quality forage. No signifi cant difference was found in either ruminal or intestinal dry matter o r crude protein disappearance between K636 and KX2 whereas K37.6 was s ignificantly lower for both values. Nearly 40% of dietary crude protei n in the K636 and KX2 leaf material escaped ruminal digestion whereas nearly 70% was non-digested for K376. For K636 and KX2, intestinal ava ilability of that protein which escaped ruminal digestion was nearly 5 0% whereas only 20% of ruminal escape protein of K376 was available in the intestines. Because KX2 produced higher forage yields, plantings on cool sites would favor the use of KX2 over K636 if animal acceptabi lity and rumen retention of dry matter are not problems.