SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - COMPARISON TO A WEEKLY CHEMOTHERAPY WITH DRUGS WITH A STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY

Citation
Jp. Sculier et al., SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - COMPARISON TO A WEEKLY CHEMOTHERAPY WITH DRUGS WITH A STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY, Revue des maladies respiratoires, 11(3), 1994, pp. 257-261
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Respiratory System
ISSN journal
07618425
Volume
11
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
257 - 261
Database
ISI
SICI code
0761-8425(1994)11:3<257:SL-CTA>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
The administration of multiple cytostatic drugs on a weekly basis has been proposed as a new intensive chemotherapy modality for small-cell lung cancer. The European Lung Cancer Working Party has conducted a ra ndomized trial comparing to a standard regimen (cyclophosphamide + adr iamycine + etoposide given at the cycle beginning) a weekly chemothera py with 7 active drugs (cyclophosphamide + adriamycine + etoposide on day 1; cisplatin + vindesine on day 8; methotrexate + vincristine on d ay 15). A total of 215 eligible patients have been registered. There h as been no significant difference between the 2 arms for response and for survival. The total relative dose-intensity has been lower in the weekly chemotherapy arm. This approach has failed to improve current r esults.