Sustainable development has been adopted by a variety of interests in
the international environmental debate, each of which constructs the m
eaning of the phrase in its own terms. The author analyses the publica
tions and activities of the international Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to
show that a business construction of sustainable development may excl
ude key elements identified by other commentators, especially three di
fferent forms of equity (intergenerational, intragenerational and inte
rnational), and concentrate instead on market mechanisms and technolog
ical change. This links sustainable development primarily to growth, a
nd only secondarily to environmental quality or social equality, and d
emonstrates how a potentially radical notion can be used by reformist
groups to influence the policy debate.