ELECTRON-TRANSFER REACTIONS OF RUTHENIUM TRISBIPYRIDYL-VIOLOGEN DONOR-ACCEPTOR MOLECULES - COMPARISON OF THE DISTANCE DEPENDENCE OF ELECTRON-TRANSFER RATES IN THE NORMAL AND MARCUS INVERTED REGIONS

Citation
Eh. Yonemoto et al., ELECTRON-TRANSFER REACTIONS OF RUTHENIUM TRISBIPYRIDYL-VIOLOGEN DONOR-ACCEPTOR MOLECULES - COMPARISON OF THE DISTANCE DEPENDENCE OF ELECTRON-TRANSFER RATES IN THE NORMAL AND MARCUS INVERTED REGIONS, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 116(11), 1994, pp. 4786-4795
Citations number
121
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry
ISSN journal
00027863
Volume
116
Issue
11
Year of publication
1994
Pages
4786 - 4795
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-7863(1994)116:11<4786:ERORTD>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
The rates of photoinduced forward and thermal back electron transfer ( ET) in a series of donor-acceptor molecules (2, 2'-bipyridine)(2)Ru(4- CH3-2,2'-bipyridine-4') (CH2),(4,4'-bipyridinium-CH3)4+ (n = 1-5, 7, 8 ) were studied by flash photolysis/transient absorbance techniques. Th e rate of intramolecular forward ET (MLCT quenching) in acetonitrile v aries exponentially with the number of carbon atoms in the spacer chai n up to n = 5 and is roughly constant for n = 5, 7, 8, consistent with a predominantly ''through bond'' electron transfer pathway for short chains and a ''through solvent'' pathway for longer chains. Encapsulat ion of the spacer chain by beta-cyclodextrin molecules slows the rate of forward ET for n = 7, 8, consistent with a ''through bond'' ET path way. The rate of back ET, which occurs in the Marcus inverted region, also varies exponentially with n, but more weakly than the forward ET rates. Apparent beta values (defined by k(ET) = A exp(-beta r(DA)), wh ere r(DA) is the donor-acceptor distance) are 1.38 and 0.66 Angstrom(- 1) for forward and back ET, respectively. However, correction of k(ET) for the distance dependence of the solvent reorganization energy give s similar values (1.0-1.2 Angstrom(-1)) of beta for the two ET reactio ns. In this case, beta describes the distance dependence of V/(2) (V = electronic coupling matrix element) rather than that of k(ET).