MYTHS OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGY

Authors
Citation
Cb. Dodrill, MYTHS OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, Clinical neuropsychologist, 11(1), 1997, pp. 1-17
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology, Clinical","Clinical Neurology",Psychology
Journal title
ISSN journal
13854046
Volume
11
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1 - 17
Database
ISI
SICI code
1385-4046(1997)11:1<1:MON>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Progress in clinical neuropsychology is being made, but not at the rat e that is found in the other clinical neurosciences. One reason for th is is the unquestioned acceptance of erroneous beliefs by neuropsychol ogists. These beliefs include the following: (1) we know what our test s measure; (2) we have tests specifically sensitive to frontal lobe fu nctioning; (3) patient self-report is reliable in indicating probable cognitive status and cognitive change; (4) above-average performances on neuropsychological tests are expected when intellectual abilities a re above average; (5) most clinical neuropsychologists are unable to d o research due to a lack of time; and (6) relationships with other neu ropsychologists are of little importance. In each case, evidence is pr esented to show that these are erroneous beliefs that are limiting pro gress in our field.