L. Mehaffey et al., COMPARISON OF P100 AND P300 CORTICAL POTENTIALS IN SPATIAL-FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION, Documenta ophthalmologica, 85(2), 1993, pp. 173-183
The P300 cortical evoked potential was compared to the P100 wave of th
e visual evoked potential by means of appearance/disappearance grating
s. The spatial frequency of the novel stimulus was varied to compare t
he effect of task sensory difficulty on both P100 and P300 potentials.
The P100 showed a steady increase in latency with the spatial frequen
cy of the uncommon stimulus, and a degree of amplitude tuning consiste
nt with the contrast sensitivity function. The P300 showed marked chan
ges in both amplitude and latency dependent almost wholly on the proxi
mity of the uncommon stimulus spatial frequency to that of the common
stimulus. Motor reaction time showed elements of both the P100 and P30
0 response patterns. The results are consistent with a model in which,
after visual information arrives at the visual cortex, processing is
parallel and interdependent. In this model, the amplitude and latency
of the P100 cortical evoked potential are governed solely by propertie
s intrinsic to the stimulus, whereas the amplitude and latency of the
P300 are functions of the degree of stimulus mismatch.