Ma. Hayes et al., ELEVATION OF SYSTEMIC OXYGEN DELIVERY IN THE TREATMENT OF CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS, The New England journal of medicine, 330(24), 1994, pp. 1717-1722
Background. Elevation of systemic oxygen delivery and consumption has
been associated with an improved outcome in critically ill patients. W
e conducted a randomized trial to determine whether boosting oxygen de
livery by infusing the inotropic agent dobutamine would improve the ou
tcome in a diverse group of such patients. Methods. On the basis of pr
eviously published recommendations, we established the following goals
: a cardiac index above 4.5 liters per minute per square meter of body
-surface area, oxygen delivery above 600 ml per minute per square mete
r, and oxygen consumption above 170 ml per minute per square meter. If
these goals were not achieved with volume expansion alone, patients w
ere randomly assigned to a treatment or control group. The treatment g
roup received intravenous dobutamine (5 to 200 mu g per kilogram of bo
dy weight per minute) until all three goals had been achieved. Dobutam
ine was administered to the control group only if the cardiac index wa
s below 2.8 liters per minute per square meter. Results. A total of 10
9 patients were studied. In nine patients the therapeutic goals were a
chieved with volume expansion alone; all nine patients survived to lea
ve the hospital. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to the treatmen
t group, and 50 to the control group. During treatment, there were no
differences between the two groups in mean arterial pressure or oxygen
consumption, despite a significantly higher cardiac index and level o
f oxygen delivery in the treatment group (P < 0.05). Although the pred
icted risk of death during hospitalization was 34 percent for both gro
ups, the in-hospital mortality was lower in the control group (34 perc
ent) than in the treatment group (54 percent) (P = 0.04; 95 percent co
nfidence interval, 0.9 to 39.1 percent). Conclusions. The use of dobut
amine to boost the cardiac index and systemic oxygen delivery failed t
o improve the outcome in this heterogeneous group of critically ill pa
tients. Contrary to what might have been expected, our results suggest
that in some cases aggressive efforts to increase oxygen consumption
may have been detrimental.