Jn. Mustonen et al., LEFT-VENTRICULAR SYSTOLIC FUNCTION IN MIDDLE-AGED PATIENTS WITH DIABETES-MELLITUS, The American journal of cardiology, 73(16), 1994, pp. 1202-1208
In cross-sectional studies of asymptomatic diabetic patients, multiple
abnormalities in left ventricular (LV) function have been found. Long
-term significance of these abnormalities is unknown because follow-up
studies have not been previously performed. LV ejection fraction (EF)
by radionuclide angiocardiography was examined in middle-aged control
subjects (n = 44), in patients with insulin-dependent (IDDM) (n = 32)
and non-insulin-dependent (NIDDM) (n = 32) diabetes mellitus at basel
ine and after 4-year follow-up. At baseline, all study subjects were f
ree from cardiovascular disease. LVEF at rest did not differ between t
he groups at baseline. The decrease in LVEF at rest during follow-up w
as 1.1 +/- 1.1% (mean +/- SEM) in control subjects, 3.1 +/- 1.3% (p =
NS, compared with control subjects) in patients with IDDM, and 7.2 +/-
1.4% (p <0.01) in patients with NIDDM. At follow-up examination, abno
rmally low LVEF at rest (<50%) was found in 7% of control subjects, 13
% of patients with IDDM (p = NS), and in 31% of patients with NIDDM (p
<0.05). Compared with control subjects, the prevalence of an abnormal
LVEF response to exercise (an increase by <5%, or a decrease) was hig
her in diabetic groups at both examinations. This prevalence increased
in control subjects from 10% at baseline to 26% at follow-up examinat
ion. In patients with IDDM, the respective increase was from 43% to 52
% (p = NS, compared with control subjects), and in patients with NIDDM
from 53% to 73% (p = NS). Duration and metabolic control of diabetes,
presence of diabetic complications, and LVEF at rest or during exerci
se at baseline did not differ in either diabetic group between the pat
ients who had normal or abnormal LVEF at rest or in response to exerci
se at follow-up examination. No study subject experienced clinical hea
rt failure during follow-up, but 7% of control subjects, 37% of patien
ts (p = 0.001) with IDDM and 34% of patients (p = <0.01) with NIDDM ha
d coronary artery disease at follow-up examination. In conclusion, LVE
F at rest deteriorated significantly during 4-year follow-up in patien
ts with NIDDM but not in patients with IDDM. A high prevalence of subc
linical LV systolic dysfunction became evident both in patients with I
DDM and patients with NIDDM as an abnormal LVEF response to exercise b
oth at baseline and follow-up examinations.