Pa. Dagenais et al., COMPARING ABILITIES OF CHILDREN WITH PROFOUND HEARING IMPAIRMENTS TO LEARN CONSONANTS USING ELECTROPALATOGRAPHY OR TRADITIONAL AURAL-ORAL TECHNIQUES, Journal of speech and hearing research, 37(3), 1994, pp. 687-699
Two groups of nine children with profound hearing impairments and low
intelligibility were taught to produce the consonants /t,d,k,g,s,z,int
egral/ using either electropalatographic (palatometry) or traditional
aural-oral techniques. Testing was completed pre-, immediately post-,
and 6 months post-treatment by examining productions of CV syllables (
V = /i,a/ using electropalatography-determined linguapalatal contacts
and listener identifications. Intelligibility was also measured using
the CID Picture Speech Intelligibility Evaluation (SPINE) test. Both g
roups improved their consonant productions as a result of 26 50-minute
sessions. Sessions were given twice daily over 3- to 4-week training
periods. Immediately post-treatment, the electropalatography-trained'
subjects produced better consonants as measured by linguapalatal conta
ct patterns and listener identifications. The linguapalatal-contact pa
tterns learned by the electropalatography-trained group better matched
normal speaker productions than did those of the traditionally traine
d group. Both groups showed equal improvement for both post-treatment
conditions when tested with the CID SPINE test. Although further resea
rch is needed, the results of this study suggest that electropalatogra
phic techniques are, at least, equal alternatives to traditional aural
-oral speech training techniques for speakers with profound hearing im
pairments.