Ms. Fanselow et al., THE IMMEDIATE-SHOCK DEFICIT AND POSTSHOCK ANALGESIA - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ANALGESIC CR AND UR, Animal learning & behavior, 22(1), 1994, pp. 72-76
Rats received a 3-sec, l-mA footshock either immediately or 3 min afte
r placement in a chamber. Postshock pain sensitivity was assessed with
the formalin test, The animals that received the 3-min delay between
placement and shock showed an analgesic response compared with no-shoc
k controls. The immediate-shock animals did not. Thus the immediate sh
ock deficit, previously reported for freezing and defecation, also occ
urs for analgesia. This suggests that shock levels sufficient to condi
tion analgesia are not necessarily sufficient to produce analgesia as
an unconditional response. As with freezing, there is a dissociation b
etween conditional and unconditional responses in the fear-conditionin
g system. Increasing immediate shock levels to 6 sec, 2 mA produced a
transient unconditional analgesia. For analgesia, a conditional respon
se is more readily produced than an unconditional response.