Despite the considerable efforts and funds devoted to cancer research
over several decades, cancer still remains a mainly lethal disease, Ca
ncer incidence and mortality have not declined at the same rate as oth
er major causes of death, indicating that primary prevention remains a
most valuable approach to decrease mortality, There is general agreem
ent that environmental exposures are variously involved in the causati
on of the majority of cancer cases and that at least half of all cance
rs could be avoided by applying existing etiologic knowledge. There is
disagreement, however, regarding the proportion of cancer risks. attr
ibutable to specific etiological factors, including diet, occupation a
nd pollution, Estimates of attributable risks are largely based today
on unverified assumptions and the calculation of attributable risks in
volves taking very unequal evidence of various types of factors and tr
eating them equally, Effective primary prevention resulting in a reduc
tion of cancer risk can be obtained by: (i) a reduction in the number
of carcinogens to which humans are exposed; or (ii) a reduction of the
exposure levels to carcinogens, Exposure levels that could be seen as
sufficiently low when based on single agents, may actually not be saf
e in the context of the many other concomitant carcinogenic and mutage
nic exposures, The list of human carcinogens and of their target organ
s might be quite different if: (i) epidemiological data were available
for a larger proportion of human exposures for which there is experim
ental evidence of carcinogenicity; (ii) more attention was paid to epi
demiological evidence that is suggestive of an exposure-cancer associa
tion, but is less than sufficient, particularly in identifying target
organs; and (iii) experimental evidence of carcinogenicity, supported
by mechanistic considerations, were more fully accepted as predictions
of human risk.