Dg. Tinkelman et al., DOUBLE-BLIND, CLINICAL EFFICACY STUDY COMPARING 400 MU-G OF PIRBUTEROL VERSUS PLACEBO DELIVERED BY A BREATH-ACTUATED AEROSOL INHALER, The Journal of asthma, 31(3), 1994, pp. 187-192
Pirbuterol is a selective beta-2 adrenergic agonist that is indicated
for the treatment of bronchospasm in patients with asthma. Traditional
ly, the most common form of administration of the beta-2 agonist is by
inhalation from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler. The purpose of th
is study was to compare the bronchodilator efficacy and safety of two
inhalations (400 mu g) of pirbuterol delivered by a breath-actuated ae
rosol (BAA) with that of two inhalations of a matching placebo. Patien
ts were studied on each of two study days with a baseline electrocardi
ogram and sequential pulmonary function testing for 6 hr. Fourteen pat
ients completed the study. The mean age was 32 years, with a range of
21-56 years. Most of these individuals had had asthma for more than 5
years. The mean percent increase in FEV(1) was 41.2% for pirbuterol co
mpared to 25.4% for placebo (p = 0.0038). The duration of improvement
of >15% over baseline was 4.5 hr for the pirbuterol group compared to
1.8 hr for the placebo group (p = 0.0022). There was no difference bet
ween the groups with respect to onset of action or time to reach peak
effect. There was no significant difference between treatments with re
spect to any cardiovascular parameter. We conclude that pirbuterol in
the BAA device produced significantly more bronchodilatation than did
placebo with respect to its peak effect, duration of effect, and perce
ntage change from baseline. Therefore, we feel that pirbuterol adminis
tered through the BAA device is a safe, effective means of treating bo
th acute and chronic asthma.