In 5% of the cases of breast cancer, the condition is attributable to
a genetic predisposition. The clinical relevance of inherited forms of
cancer lies in the fact that periodic screening of close relatives of
patients may prevent disease and death due to cancer. Although survei
llance programmes for hereditary cancers have been recommended for man
y years, there is still little or no evidence that surveillance will i
mprove the prognosis. In particular, screening for breast and ovarian
cancers gives rise to many problems, because there is no precursor les
ion that can easily be identified, such as an adenomatous polyp in fam
ilial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal can
cer. This means that prospective controlled studies are urgently neede
d to assess the value of the recommended screening protocols. National
and regional hereditary cancer registries may play an important role
in the evaluation of the effect of long-term surveillance. Presymptoma
tic testing based on DNA technology will probably become feasible for
breast cancer in the near future. A major advantage of DNA analysis in
this context is that screening can be focused on high-risk individual
s and the family members at low risk can be less rigorously followed.
Because of unanticipated consequences associated with DNA analysis, mu
ch research remains to be done to define the psychosocial implications
of presymptomatic DNA diagnosis.