Mp. Doyle et al., NUCLEOSIDE-INDUCED ARTERIOLAR CONSTRICTION - A MAST CELL-DEPENDENT RESPONSE, The American journal of physiology, 266(5), 1994, pp. 80002042-80002050
Adenosine (Ado) is a potent vasodilator that has occasionally been sho
wn to cause vasoconstriction. Constrictor responses are generally attr
ibuted to A(1)-receptor stimulation or interactions with the renin-ang
iotensin system. We describe a previously unreported vasoconstrictor a
ction of Ado and inosine (Ino) in hamster cheek pouch arterioles and e
xamine the mechanism by which these nucleosides induce constriction. A
rterioles were dissected from male Golden hamster cheek pouches, trans
ferred to a 37 degrees C tissue chamber, and cannulated at both ends.
Changes of luminal diameter in response to Ado were measured to genera
te cumulative concentration-response curves. The concentration-respons
e curves were biphasic: 10(-6) M Ado elicited an intense, transient co
nstriction, and higher concentrations induced dilator responses. Pretr
eatment with 8(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline, an Ado receptor antagonist,
inhibited the dilator responses but did not alter the constriction. I
nhibition of Ado uptake with S-(4-nitrobenzyl)-6-thio-inosine eliminat
ed the constrictor response without altering dilator responses. Simila
r effects were found after pretreatment with an Ado deaminase inhibito
r erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)adenine hydrochloride. Finally, Ino, a
metabolite of Ado, induced constrictions of similar magnitude to those
seen with Ado, but at higher concentrations. The constrictor response
was focal in nature, suggesting discrete sites of action of Ado. Meth
ylene blue staining after Ado application revealed degranulated mast c
ells closely associated with the vessel wall, indicating a possible ro
le for mast cell degranulation in the constrictor response. Supporting
this idea were the observations that inhibition of degranulation by 1
0 mu M cromolyn blocked the constrictor response, and compound 48/80 (
a mast cell secretagogue) caused constriction similar to that elicited
by Ado. We hypothesize that these constrictions are either due to upt
ake and intracellular metabolism of the nucleosides or to activation o
f a non A(1)/A(2)-receptor (e.g., the A(3)-receptor) with resultant de
granulation and subsequent vasoconstriction.