The effects of actigraph placement and device sensitivity on actigraph
ic automatic sleep-wake scoring were assessed using concomitant polyso
mnographic and wrist actigraphic data from dominant and nondominant ha
nds of 20 adults and 16 adolescents during 1 laboratory night. Althoug
h activity levels differed between dominant and nondominant wrists dur
ing periods of sleep (F = 4.57; p < 0.05) and wake (F = 15.5; p < 0.00
05), resulting sleep-wake scoring algorithms were essentially the same
and were equally explanatory (R(2) = 0.64; P < 0.0001). When the slee
p-wake scoring algorithm derived from the nondominant hand was used to
score the nondominant data for sleep-wake, overall agreement rates wi
th polysomnography scoring ranged between 91 and 93% for the calibrati
on and validation samples. Results obtained with the same algorithm fo
r the dominant-wrist data were within the same range. Agreement for sl
eep scoring was consistently higher than for wake scoring. Statistical
manipulation of activity levels before applying the scoring algorithm
indicated that this algorithm is quite robust toward moderate changes
in activity level. Use of ''twin-wrist actigraphy'' enables identific
ation of artifacts that may result from breathing-related motions.