Twenty-seven narcoleptic patients severely affected with cataplexy com
pleted four symptom diaries over a 4-month period in order to clarify
some of the controversies surrounding assessment of anticataplectic me
dications. The home diary method was found to be a viable model for th
e assessment of anticataplectic activity. Assessment of reliability in
1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5- and 10-day intervals indicated that reliability in
creases with the number of days included. A 10-day design was found to
be optimal. Reliability decreased, however, with each successive diar
y over the 4-month period. Power analysis indicates that two groups of
30-40 subjects in a parallel design, or one group of 30-40 subjects i
n a crossover design, would be sufficient to demonstrate a significant
therapeutic anticataplectic effect in most cases. A ''first diary eff
ect'' was observed, suggesting that a training period prior to the act
ual trial might improve reliability. Whether the patient was treated o
r untreated with stimulant medications did not affect severity or fluc
tuation of cataplexy, suggesting that both groups of patients could be
included in therapeutic trials. No time-of-day fluctuation was observ
ed in the daily distribution of cataplexy attacks. Sudden increases in
cataplexy were often, although not always, caused by unusual emotiona
l events or sleepiness. The finding of a long-lasting ''precataplectic
'' feeling or ''aura'' pointed to the need to carefully clarify the sy
mptom prior to beginning a therapeutic trial.